Comparison of measured data

We conducted a comparative expe>₽←riment for six months on three tπ∏ypes of sensors: XFC2-2H, propeller tyδ¶ε≥pe of American Y brand, and £​Ultrasonic type of Finnis∏€₽™h V brand. One month'←×;s wind speed measurement data is ☆$'shown in the figure. The cons♥φistency of the data measured b∞‌y the three wind speed sens♦€♣→ors is good. The wind sensor of pδ✘§ropeller tail type re​©↑quires an adjustment cycl$≈£e to make the windward surface t✔±©o catch up with the wind d÷¶Ωirection, and accurate ↑ ÷₽wind speed values can be only measuα↓red when the propeller is facing th≤εe windward surface. Taki <€ng the comparison data as a refλ"erence, due to the lower starting valu₹™✘Ωes of wind speed and wind •∏>direction, the wind speed response ✔&↑;of XFC2-2H was sig®→φnificantly faster.